Categoría: Geovanny Vicente

TWINSBURG, Ohio, March 1, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — The HC Companies – North America’s leading manufacturer of horticultural containers – has been formally recognized by the Forest Stewardship Council® for their portfolio of fiber growing and protective packaging solutions with the designation of «FSC® Recycled 100%». This recognition is part of HC’s continued commitment towards manufacturing more sustainable offerings for the market.

«For over 30 years, HC’s been providing fiber-based solutions to the North American market – helping organizations and communities positively impact their environmental footprint,» says Bob Mayer, President and CEO of The HC Companies. «We are honored that our fiber-based solutions now carry this prestigious designation as we continue to innovate our product line to satisfy the environmental demands of growers, garden centers, big-box stores and of course consumers.»

Products which bear the «FSC® Recycled 100%» designation have been verified as being made from 100% recycled content (either post-consumer or pre-consumer reclaimed materials). The use of FSC Recycled products can help to alleviate the pressure of demand on sources of virgin material, thereby helping to protect the world’s forests.

The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) is a global, not-for-profit organization dedicated to the promotion of responsible forest management worldwide. FSC defines standards based on agreed principles for consistent forest stewardships, which are supported by environmental, social and economic stakeholders.

Choosing products with the FSC designation ensures that both customers and organizations are doing their part to preserve forests across the globe.

Learn more about The HC Companies fiber-based growing containers and protective packaging solutions by visiting their website hc-sustainable.com.

About The HC Companies, Inc.
HC is your first-choice provider for horticultural containers – servicing the professional grower, grower-distributor, retail garden center and mass merchandiser throughout North America, with a wide variety of both resin and sustainable solutions to fit your unique growing needs. For more information on The HC Companies, please call 800-225-7712, visit their website or connect with them on LinkedIn.

Media Contact:
Craig Ruvere
Marketing Communications Manager
cruvere@hc-companies.com 
330-805-6384

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hcs-fiber-solutions-earn-fsc-recycled-100-designation-301236095.html

SOURCE The HC Companies

New Orders, Production & Employment Growing

Supplier Deliveries Slowing at Faster Rate; Backlog Growing

Raw Materials Inventories Contracting; Customers’ Inventories Too Low

Prices Increasing; Exports and Imports Growing

TEMPE, Ariz., March 1, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — Economic activity in the manufacturing sector grew in February, with the overall economy notching a ninth consecutive month of growth, say the nation’s supply executives in the latest Manufacturing ISM^® Report On Business^®.

The report was issued today by Timothy R. Fiore, CPSM, C.P.M., Chair of the Institute for Supply Management^® (ISM^®) Manufacturing Business Survey Committee:

«The February Manufacturing PMI^® registered 60.8 percent, an increase of 2.1 percentage points from the January reading of 58.7 percent. This figure indicates expansion in the overall economy for the ninth month in a row after contraction in March, April, and May. The New Orders Index registered 64.8 percent, up 3.7 percentage points from the January reading of 61.1 percent. The Production Index registered 63.2 percent, an increase of 2.5 percentage points compared to the January reading of 60.7 percent. The Backlog of Orders Index registered 64 percent, 4.3 percentage points above the January reading of 59.7 percent. The Employment Index registered 54.4 percent, 1.8 percentage points higher from the January reading of 52.6 percent. The Supplier Deliveries Index registered 72 percent, up 3.8 percentage points from the January figure of 68.2 percent. The Inventories Index registered 49.7 percent, 1.1 percentage points lower than the January reading of 50.8 percent. The Prices Index registered 86 percent, up 3.9 percentage points compared to the January reading of 82.1 percent. The New Export Orders Index registered 57.2 percent, an increase of 2.3 percentage points compared to the January reading of 54.9 percent. The Imports Index registered 56.1 percent, a 0.7-percentage point decrease from the January reading of 56.8 percent.»

Fiore continues, «The manufacturing economy continued its recovery in February. Survey Committee members reported that their companies and suppliers continue to operate in reconfigured factories. Issues with absenteeism, short-term shutdowns to sanitize facilities, and difficulties in hiring workers remain challenges and continue to cause strains that limit manufacturing-growth potential. Optimistic panel sentiment increased, with five positive comments for every cautious comment, compared to a 3-to-1 ratio in January. Demand expanded, with the (1) New Orders Index growing at a strong level, supported by the New Export Orders Index expanding at a faster rate, (2) Customers’ Inventories Index remaining in ‘too low’ territory (at 32.5 percent, tying its all-time low), and the (3) Backlog of Orders Index growing 4.3 percentage points compared to January. Consumption (measured by the Production and Employment indexes) contributed positively (a combined 4.3-percentage point increase) to the Manufacturing PMI^® calculation. Five of the top six industries reported moderate to strong expansion. The Employment Index expanded for the third straight month, but panelists continue to note significant difficulties in attracting and retaining labor at their companies and supplier facilities. Inputs — expressed as supplier deliveries, inventories and imports — continued to indicate input-driven constraints to production expansion, at higher rates compared to January, as indicated by the Inventories Index returning to contraction territory and another month of slowing supplier delivery performance. Imports marginally slowed in the period, driven by port backlogs. The Prices Index expanded for the ninth consecutive month, indicating continued supplier pricing power and scarcity of supply chain goods.

«Of the six biggest manufacturing industries, five — Chemical Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Transportation Equipment; Computer & Electronic Products; and Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products — registered strong growth in February. Petroleum & Coal Products moderately contracted.

«Manufacturing performed well for the ninth straight month, with demand, consumption and inputs registering strong growth compared to January. Labor-market difficulties at panelists’ companies and their suppliers continued to restrict manufacturing-economy expansion and will remain the primary headwind to production growth until employment levels and factory operations can return to normal across the entire supply chain,» says Fiore.

Of the 18 manufacturing industries, 16 reported growth in February, in the following order: Textile Mills; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Primary Metals; Paper Products; Chemical Products; Machinery; Fabricated Metal Products; Transportation Equipment; Wood Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Furniture & Related Products; and Nonmetallic Mineral Products. The two industries reporting contraction in February are: Printing & Related Support Activities; and Petroleum & Coal Products.

WHAT RESPONDENTS ARE SAYING

• «The coronavirus [COVID-19] pandemic is affecting us in terms of getting material to build from local and our overseas third- and fourth-tier suppliers. Suppliers are complaining of [a lack of] available resources [people] for manufacturing, creating major delivery issues.» (Computer & Electronic Products)
• «Supply chains are depleted; inventories up and down the supply chain are empty. Lead times increasing, prices increasing, [and] demand increasing. Deep freeze in the Gulf Coast expected to extend duration of shortages.» (Chemical Products)
• «Steel prices have increased significantly in recent months, driving costs up from our suppliers and on proposals for new work that we are bidding. In addition, the tariffs and anti-dumping fees/penalties incurred by international mills/suppliers are being passed on to us.» (Transportation Equipment)
• «We have experienced a higher rate of delinquent shipments from our ingredient suppliers in the last month. We are still struggling keeping our production lines fully manned. We anticipate a fast and large order surge in the food-service sector as restaurants open back up.» (Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products)
• «Overall capacities are full across our industry. Logistics times are at record times. Continuing to fight through shipping and increased lead times on both raw materials and finished goods due to the pandemic.» (Fabricated Metal Products)
• «Prices are going up, and lead times are growing longer by the day. While business and backlog remain strong, the supply chain is going to be stretched very [thin] to keep up.» (Machinery)
• «Things are now out of control. Everything is a mess, and we are seeing wide-scale shortages.» (Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components)
• «Labor shortages at suppliers are affecting material deliveries and prices.» (Plastics & Rubber Products)
• «We have seen our new-order log increase by 40 percent over the last two months. We are overloaded with orders and do not have the personnel to get product out the door on schedule.» (Primary Metals)
• «A sense of urgency is being felt regarding new orders. Customers are giving an impression that a presence of stability is forthcoming and order flow is increasing.» (Textile Mills)
• «Prices are rising so rapidly that many are wondering if [the situation] is sustainable. Shortages have the industry concerned for supply going forward, at least deep into the second quarter.» (Wood Products)

Manufacturing ISM^® Report On Business^® data is seasonally adjusted for the New Orders, Production, Employment and Inventories indexes.
*Number of months moving in current direction.

COMMODITIES REPORTED UP/DOWN IN PRICE AND IN SHORT SUPPLY

Commodities Up in Price
Acetone; Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) Plastic (2); Aluminum (9); Aluminum Extrusions; Capacitors; Copper (9); Corrugate (5); Corrugated Boxes (4); Crude Oil (3); Diesel (2); Electrical Components (3); Electronic Components (3); Fiberglass Products; Freight (4); High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) (2); Lumber (8); Methyl Methacrylate; Natural Gas (2); Nylon Fiber (2); Ocean Freight (3); Oil-Derived Products; Packaging Supplies (3); Paper Products (3); Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) — Gloves (3); Plastic Resins (6); Plywood; Polyethylene; Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET); Polypropylene (8); Polyurethane Foam Products; Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) (5); Precious Metals (2); Propylene (2); Resin-Based Products; Resistors; Rubber Products; Semiconductors; Solvents — Other; Soybean Products (5); Steel (7); Steel — Carbon (3); Steel — Cold Rolled (6); Steel — Hot Rolled (6); Steel — Scrap (3); Steel — Stainless (4); Steel Plate; Steel Products (6); and Wood — Pallets (3).

Commodities Down in Price
Dairy.

Commodities in Short Supply
Acetone; Aluminum; Computer Displays/Monitors; Corrugate (2); Corrugated Boxes (4); Electrical Components (5); Electronic Components (3); Freight — Ocean; Isocyanates; Methacrylate; Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) — Gloves (12); Plastic Products; Polypropylene; Propylene; Semiconductors (3); Steel (3); Steel — Cold Rolled (2); Steel — Hot Rolled (4); Steel — Specialty; and Steel Products.

Note: The number of consecutive months the commodity is listed is indicated after each item.

FEBRUARY 2021 MANUFACTURING INDEX SUMMARIES

Manufacturing PMI^®
Manufacturing grew in February, as the Manufacturing PMI^® registered 60.8 percent, 2.1 percentage points higher than the January reading of 58.7 percent. This equals the highest reading since February 2018 (60.8 percent); prior to that, the PMI^® registered 61.4 percent in May 2004. «The Manufacturing PMI^® continued to indicate strong sector expansion and U.S. economic growth in February. Four of the five subindexes that directly factor into the PMI^® were in growth territory and at a higher level compared to January. Of the six biggest manufacturing industries, five — Chemical Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Transportation Equipment; Computer & Electronic Products; and Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products — expanded. The New Orders and Production indexes continued to expand at strong levels. The Supplier Deliveries Index continued to reflect suppliers’ difficulties in maintaining delivery rates, due to factory labor-safety issues and transportation challenges. Nine of 10 subindexes were positive for the period; a reading of ‘too low’ for Customers’ Inventories Index is considered a positive for future production,» says Fiore. A reading above 50 percent indicates that the manufacturing economy is generally expanding; below 50 percent indicates that it is generally contracting.

A Manufacturing PMI^® above 43.1 percent, over a period of time, generally indicates an expansion of the overall economy. Therefore, the February Manufacturing PMI^® indicates the overall economy grew in February for the ninth consecutive month following contractions in March, April, and May. «The past relationship between the Manufacturing PMI^® and the overall economy indicates that the Manufacturing PMI^® for January (60.8 percent) corresponds to a 5-percent increase in real gross domestic product (GDP) on an annualized basis,» says Fiore.

THE LAST 12 MONTHS

New Orders
ISM^®‘s New Orders Index registered 64.8 percent in February, up 3.7 percentage points compared to the 61.1 percent reported in January. This indicates that new orders grew for the ninth consecutive month. «Of the six largest manufacturing sectors, five — Transportation Equipment; Chemical Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Computer & Electronic Products; and Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products — expanded at very strong levels. Petroleum & Coal Products retained its previous-month reading of 50 percent,» says Fiore. A New Orders Index above 52.8 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Census Bureau’s series on manufacturing orders (in constant 2000 dollars).

Of the 18 manufacturing industries, the 13 that reported growth in new orders in February — in the following order — are: Paper Products; Wood Products; Primary Metals; Textile Mills; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Transportation Equipment; Chemical Products; Machinery; Fabricated Metal Products; Printing & Related Support Activities; Computer & Electronic Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; and Plastics & Rubber Products. The only industry reporting a decline in new orders in February is Miscellaneous Manufacturing.

Production
The Production Index registered 63.2 percent in February, 2.5 percentage points higher than the January reading of 60.7 percent, indicating growth for the ninth consecutive month. «Five (Chemical Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Transportation Equipment; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; and Computer & Electronic Products) of the top six industries expanded at moderate to strong levels,» says Fiore. An index above 52.1 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Federal Reserve Board’s Industrial Production figures.

The 14 industries reporting growth in production during the month of February — listed in order — are: Paper Products; Textile Mills; Primary Metals; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Machinery; Chemical Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Wood Products; Transportation Equipment; Plastics & Rubber Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Furniture & Related Products; Computer & Electronic Products; and Miscellaneous Manufacturing. The two industries reporting decreased production in February are: Printing & Related Support Activities; and Nonmetallic Mineral Products.

Employment
ISM^®‘s Employment Index registered 54.4 percent in February, 1.8 percentage points higher than the January reading of 52.6 percent. «The Employment Index grew for the third month in a row, with five (Chemical Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Transportation Equipment; Computer & Electronic Products; and Fabricated Metal Products) of the six big industry sectors expanding. Continued strong new-order levels, low customer inventories and an expanding backlog indicate potential employment strength for the rest of the first quarter. For the sixth straight month, survey panelists’ comments indicate that significantly more companies are hiring or attempting to hire than those reducing labor forces,» says Fiore. An Employment Index above 50.6 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data on manufacturing employment.

Of the 18 manufacturing industries, the 11 industries to report employment growth in February — in the following order — are: Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Textile Mills; Primary Metals; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Machinery; Chemical Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Transportation Equipment; Computer & Electronic Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; and Fabricated Metal Products. The four industries reporting a decrease in employment in February are: Printing & Related Support Activities; Furniture & Related Products; Petroleum & Coal Products; and Paper Products.

Supplier Deliveries^†
The delivery performance of suppliers to manufacturing organizations was slower in February, as the Supplier Deliveries Index registered 72 percent. This is 3.8 percentage points higher than the 68.2 percent reported in January. «Suppliers continue to struggle to deliver, with deliveries slowing at a faster rate compared to the previous month. Transportation challenges and challenges in supplier-labor markets are still constraining production growth — and to a greater extent compared to January. The Supplier Deliveries Index also reflects difficulties suppliers continue to experience due to COVID-19 impacts combined with strong growth in economic activity. Since stable manufacturing began in August 2020, the index has gone up every month, indicating that suppliers are experiencing greater difficulties in meeting factory needs. Supplier labor and transportation constraints are not expected to diminish in the near-to-moderate term due to COVID-19 impacts,» says Fiore. A reading below 50 percent indicates faster deliveries, while a reading above 50 percent indicates slower deliveries.

Of the 18 industries, 16 reported slower supplier deliveries in February, listed in the following order: Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Textile Mills; Fabricated Metal Products; Furniture & Related Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Paper Products; Machinery; Chemical Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Transportation Equipment; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Wood Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; and Primary Metals. No industries reported faster supplier deliveries in February.

*Supplier Deliveries is no longer seasonally adjusted; however, due to more precise rounding, this number increased by 0.1 percentage point.

Inventories
The Inventories Index registered 49.7 percent in February, 1.1 percentage points lower than the 50.8 percent reported for January. Inventories contracted after four consecutive months of marginal growth, following three months of contraction. «Inventory-growth stability in light of ongoing supplier constraints indicates that supply chains are meeting near-term production demand, despite transportation challenges and COVID-19 headwinds. However, supplier delivery rates are not strong enough to grow inventories, as most panelists would prefer,» says Fiore. An Inventories Index greater than 44.5 percent, over time, is generally consistent with expansion in the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) figures on overall manufacturing inventories (in chained 2000 dollars).

The six industries reporting higher inventories in February — listed in order — are: Textile Mills; Primary Metals; Chemical Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Machinery; and Fabricated Metal Products. The five industries reporting a decrease in inventories in February are: Printing & Related Support Activities; Paper Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; and Miscellaneous Manufacturing. Seven industries reported no change in February compared to January.

Customers’ Inventories^†
ISM^®‘s Customers’ Inventories Index registered 32.5 percent in February, 0.6 percentage point lower than the 33.1 percent reported for January, indicating that customers’ inventory levels were considered too low. «Customers’ inventories are too low for the 55th consecutive month, a positive for future production growth. This reading is tied with December 2009 as the lowest reported since the subindex was established in January 1997. For seven months in a row, the Customers’ Inventories Index has been at historically low levels,» says Fiore.

Of the 18 industries, the only one reporting higher customers’ inventories in February is Printing & Related Support Activities. The 16 industries reporting customers’ inventories as too low during February — listed in order — are: Fabricated Metal Products; Wood Products; Machinery; Primary Metals; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Transportation Equipment; Petroleum & Coal Products; Paper Products; Furniture & Related Products; Chemical Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Plastics & Rubber Products; Textile Mills; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; and Miscellaneous Manufacturing.

Prices^†
The ISM^® Prices Index registered 86 percent, an increase of 3.9 percentage points compared to the January reading of 82.1 percent, indicating raw materials prices increased for the ninth consecutive month. This is the index’s highest reading since May 2008, when it registered 88.1 percent. «Aluminum, copper, chemicals, all varieties of steel, soy, petroleum-based products including plastics, transportation costs, electrical and electronic components, corrugate, and wood and lumber products all continued to record price increases,» says Fiore. A Prices Index above 52.7 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Producer Price Index for Intermediate Materials.

All 18 industries reported paying increased prices for raw materials in February, in the following order: Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Furniture & Related Products; Paper Products; Primary Metals; Fabricated Metal Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Machinery; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Petroleum & Coal Products; Textile Mills; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Chemical Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Printing & Related Support Activities; Wood Products; Transportation Equipment; and Computer & Electronic Products.

Backlog of Orders^†
ISM^®‘s Backlog of Orders Index registered 64 percent in February, a 4.3-percentage point increase compared to the 59.7 percent reported in January, indicating order backlogs expanded for the eighth consecutive month. February’s reading is the second-highest since January 1993, when reporting for this subindex began, exceeded only by April 2004 (66.5 percent). «Backlogs expanded at faster rates in February, indicating that new-order intakes more than fully offset production outputs for the eighth straight month. Five (Transportation Equipment; Computer & Electronic Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Chemical Products; and Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products) of the six big industry sectors’ backlogs expanded with significant strength,» says Fiore.

The 14 industries reporting growth in order backlogs in February, in the following order, are: Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Machinery; Transportation Equipment; Wood Products; Textile Mills; Paper Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Primary Metals; Chemical Products; Furniture & Related Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; and Miscellaneous Manufacturing. No industries reported a decline in February compared to January.

New Export Orders^†
ISM^®‘s New Export Orders Index registered 57.2 percent in February, up 2.3 percentage points compared to the January reading of 54.9 percent. «The New Export Orders Index grew for the eighth consecutive month at a faster rate. Five (Transportation Equipment; Fabricated Metal Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Computer & Electronic Products; and Chemical Products) of the six big industry sectors expanded. New export orders were again a positive factor to the growth in the New Orders Index,» says Fiore.

The 13 industries reporting growth in new export orders in February — in the following order — are: Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Textile Mills; Wood Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Machinery; Transportation Equipment; Fabricated Metal Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Primary Metals; Computer & Electronic Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Plastics & Rubber Products; and Chemical Products. The only industry reporting a decrease in new export orders is Furniture & Related Products.

Imports^†
ISM^®‘s Imports Index registered 56.1 percent in February, a decrease of 0.7 percentage point compared to the 56.8 percent reported for January. «Imports expanded for the eighth consecutive month, at slightly lower rates compared to January, reflecting continued increases in U.S. factory demand and interest in increasing on-shore inventory. Panelists continued to note record-breaking backlogs in ports of entry, as well as difficulties in arranging drayage and operating within the domestic transportation market,» says Fiore.

The 10 industries reporting growth in imports in February — in the following order — are: Textile Mills; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Transportation Equipment; Primary Metals; Machinery; Computer & Electronic Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Chemical Products; and Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components. Two industries reported a decrease in imports in February: Furniture & Related Products; and Plastics & Rubber Products. Six industries reported no change in imports in February compared to January.

^†The Supplier Deliveries, Customers’ Inventories, Prices, Backlog of Orders, New Export Orders and Imports indexes do not meet the accepted criteria for seasonal adjustments.

Buying Policy
Average commitment lead time for Capital Expenditures increased in February by one day to 142 days. Average lead time for Production Materials decreased in February by one day to 67 days. Average lead time for Maintenance, Repair and Operating (MRO) Supplies decreased in February by one day to 38 days.

About This Report
DO NOT CONFUSE THIS NATIONAL REPORT with the various regional purchasing reports released across the country. The national report’s information reflects the entire U.S., while the regional reports contain primarily regional data from their local vicinities. Also, the information in the regional reports is not used in calculating the results of the national report. The information compiled in this report is for the month of February 2021.

The data presented herein is obtained from a survey of manufacturing supply executives based on information they have collected within their respective organizations. ISM^® makes no representation, other than that stated within this release, regarding the individual company data collection procedures. The data should be compared to all other economic data sources when used in decision-making.

Data and Method of Presentation
The Manufacturing ISM^®Report On Business^® is based on data compiled from purchasing and supply executives nationwide. The composition of the Manufacturing Business Survey Committee is stratified according to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and each of the following NAICS-based industry’s contribution to gross domestic product (GDP): Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Textile Mills; Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Wood Products; Paper Products; Printing & Related Support Activities; Petroleum & Coal Products; Chemical Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Primary Metals; Fabricated Metal Products; Machinery; Computer & Electronic Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Transportation Equipment; Furniture & Related Products; and Miscellaneous Manufacturing (products such as medical equipment and supplies, jewelry, sporting goods, toys and office supplies). The data are weighted based on each industry’s contribution to GDP. According to the BEA estimates for 2018 GDP (released October 29, 2019), the six largest manufacturing subsectors are: Computer & Electronic Products; Chemical Products; Transportation Equipment Manufacturing; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Petroleum & Coal Products; and Fabricated Metal Products. Beginning in February 2018 with January 2018 data, computation of the indexes is accomplished utilizing unrounded numbers.

Survey responses reflect the change, if any, in the current month compared to the previous month. For each of the indicators measured (New Orders, Backlog of Orders, New Export Orders, Imports, Production, Supplier Deliveries, Inventories, Customers’ Inventories, Employment and Prices), this report shows the percentage reporting each response, the net difference between the number of responses in the positive economic direction (higher, better and slower for Supplier Deliveries) and the negative economic direction (lower, worse and faster for Supplier Deliveries), and the diffusion index. Responses are raw data and are never changed. The diffusion index includes the percent of positive responses plus one-half of those responding the same (considered positive).

The resulting single index number for those meeting the criteria for seasonal adjustments (Manufacturing PMI^®, New Orders, Production, Employment and Inventories) is then seasonally adjusted to allow for the effects of repetitive intra-year variations resulting primarily from normal differences in weather conditions, various institutional arrangements, and differences attributable to non-moveable holidays. All seasonal adjustment factors are subject annually to relatively minor changes when conditions warrant them. The Manufacturing PMI^® is a composite index based on the diffusion indexes of five of the indexes with equal weights: New Orders (seasonally adjusted), Production (seasonally adjusted), Employment (seasonally adjusted), Supplier Deliveries (seasonally adjusted), and Inventories.

Diffusion indexes have the properties of leading indicators and are convenient summary measures showing the prevailing direction of change and the scope of change. A Manufacturing PMI^® reading above 50 percent indicates that the manufacturing economy is generally expanding; below 50 percent indicates that it is generally declining. A Manufacturing PMI^® above 43.1 percent, over a period of time, indicates that the overall economy, or gross domestic product (GDP), is generally expanding; below 43.1 percent, it is generally declining. The distance from 50 percent or 43.1 percent is indicative of the extent of the expansion or decline. With some of the indicators within this report, ISM^® has indicated the departure point between expansion and decline of comparable government series, as determined by regression analysis. The Manufacturing ISM^® Report On Business^® survey is sent out to Manufacturing Business Survey Committee respondents the first part of each month. Respondents are asked to report on information for the current month for U.S. operations only. ISM^® receives survey responses throughout most of any given month, with the majority of respondents generally waiting until late in the month to submit responses to give the most accurate picture of current business activity. ISM^® then compiles the report for release on the first business day of the following month.

The industries reporting growth, as indicated in the Manufacturing ISM^® Report On Business^® monthly report, are listed in the order of most growth to least growth. For the industries reporting contraction or decreases, those are listed in the order of the highest level of contraction/decrease to the least level of contraction/decrease.

Responses to Buying Policy reflect the percent reporting the current month’s lead time, the approximate weighted number of days ahead for which commitments are made for Capital Expenditures; Production Materials; and Maintenance, Repair and Operating (MRO) Supplies, expressed as hand-to-mouth (five days), 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, six months (180 days), a year or more (360 days), and the weighted average number of days. These responses are raw data, never revised, and not seasonally adjusted since there is no significant seasonal pattern.

ISM ROB Content
The Institute for Supply Management^® («ISM») Report On Business^® (both Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing) («ISM ROB») contains information, text, files, images, video, sounds, musical works, works of authorship, applications, and any other materials or content (collectively, «Content») of ISM («ISM ROB Content»). ISM ROB Content is protected by copyright, trademark, trade secret, and other laws, and as between you and ISM, ISM owns and retains all rights in the ISM ROB Content. ISM hereby grants you a limited, revocable, nonsublicensable license to access and display on your individual device the ISM ROB Content (excluding any software code) solely for your personal, non-commercial use. The ISM ROB Content shall also contain Content of users and other ISM licensors. Except as provided herein or as explicitly allowed in writing by ISM, you shall not copy, download, stream, capture, reproduce, duplicate, archive, upload, modify, translate, publish, broadcast, transmit, retransmit, distribute, perform, display, sell, or otherwise use any ISM ROB Content.

Except as explicitly and expressly permitted by ISM, you are strictly prohibited from creating works or materials (including but not limited to tables, charts, data streams, time-series variables, fonts, icons, link buttons, wallpaper, desktop themes, online postcards, montages, mashups and similar videos, greeting cards, and unlicensed merchandise) that derive from or are based on the ISM ROB Content. This prohibition applies regardless of whether the derivative works or materials are sold, bartered, or given away. You shall not either directly or through the use of any device, software, internet site, web-based service, or other means remove, alter, bypass, avoid, interfere with, or circumvent any copyright, trademark, or other proprietary notices marked on the Content or any digital rights management mechanism, device, or other content protection or access control measure associated with the Content including geo-filtering mechanisms. Without prior written authorization from ISM, you shall not build a business utilizing the Content, whether or not for profit.

You shall not create, recreate, distribute, incorporate in other work, or advertise an index of any portion of the Content unless you receive prior written authorization from ISM. Requests for permission to reproduce or distribute ISM ROB Content can be made by contacting in writing at: ISM Research, Institute for Supply Management, 309 West Elliot Road, Suite 113, Tempe, Arizona 85284-1556, or by emailing kcahill@ismworld.org. Subject: Content Request.

ISM shall not have any liability, duty, or obligation for or relating to the ISM ROB Content or other information contained herein, any errors, inaccuracies, omissions or delays in providing any ISM ROB Content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. In no event shall ISM be liable for any special, incidental, or consequential damages, arising out of the use of the ISM ROB. Report On Business^®, PMI^®, and NMI^® are registered trademarks of Institute for Supply Management^®. Institute for Supply Management^® and ISM^® are registered trademarks of Institute for Supply Management, Inc.

About Institute for Supply Management^®
Institute for Supply Management^® (ISM^®) serves supply management professionals in more than 90 countries. Its 50,000 members around the world manage about US$1 trillion in corporate and government supply chain procurement annually. Founded in 1915 as the first supply management institute in the world, ISM is committed to advancing the practice of supply management to drive value and competitive advantage for its members, contributing to a prosperous and sustainable world. ISM leads the profession through the ISM Report On Business^®, its highly regarded certification programs and the ISM Mastery Model^®. This report has been issued by the association since 1931, except for a four-year interruption during World War II.

The full text version of the Manufacturing ISM^® Report On Business^® is posted on ISM^®‘s website at www.ismrob.org on the first business day* of every month after 10:00 a.m. ET.

The next Manufacturing ISM^® Report On Business^® featuring March 2021 data will be released at 10:00 a.m. ET on Thursday, April 1, 2021.

*Unless the New York Stock Exchange is closed.

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/manufacturing-pmi-at-60-8-february-2021-manufacturing-ism-report-on-business-301236952.html

SOURCE Institute for Supply Management

ALBANY, N.Y., March 1, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — Renewable energy generation has become one of the most important aspects in terms of clean energy. Technologies associated with renewable energy are gaining considerable traction across the globe. Numerous countries are embracing renewable energy systems for the preservation of exhausting non-renewable resources. Based on all these factors, the floating solar panels market will experience promising growth across the assessment period. In addition, the plethora of benefits offered by floating solar panels will serve as positive growth indicators.

Floating photovoltaic (FPV), better known as floating solar panels is a type of solar array that floats on water bodies. These panels are specially designed for their capability to float on water. These panels are most likely to be located on a basin or a lake. The panels are also installed on man-made reservoirs. The installation of solar panels on an ocean is a tedious affair because of the constantly moving waves. 

The experts at Transparency Market Research (TMR), after a detailed and scrutinized analysis, expect the global floating solar panels market to record a CAGR of 43.02 percent between 2019 and 2027.

Request for Covid-19 Impact Analysis on Floating Solar Panels Market: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/Covid19.php

Innovations and technological advancements are inviting promising growth opportunities for the floating solar panels market. The rising adoption of floating solar panels in developing countries like India and China will further boost growth. The cooling effect of water bodies helps the solar panels to perform well as their output is decreased under high temperatures. These advantages will propel the growth opportunities across the floating solar panels market during the forecast period.

Download PDF Brochure – https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php

Key Findings of the Report

Huge Investments from Large Conglomerates and Governments of Numerous Countries to Add Extra Stars of Growth to the Floating Solar Panels Market

Clean energy initiatives are attracting extensive investments from various firms and businesses. Governments of various countries are also investing heftily in such initiatives. The floating solar panels market, being a part of the clean energy products observes multiple investments. For instance, Amazon recently announced a large investment in renewable energy in Brazil. It will be Amazon’s largest single-site renewable project to date. It will comprise a floating solar park and other clean energy-generating equipment.

In another instance, the Cochin International Airport in Kerala, India approved the installation of one of the biggest floating solar plants. It has a capacity of generating 453 kWh power. The state of Goa in India will also see the installation of a 1 GW solar power plant. Such developments invite tremendous growth opportunities for the floating solar panels market.

View Detailed Table of Contents at https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/report-toc/2952

Research and Development Activities to Boost Growth Prospects of Floating Solar Panels Market

The ongoing research and development activities across the solar panels industry are leading to the discovery of novel insights. This aspect will invite exponential growth opportunities for the floating solar panels market. Various initiatives related to the development of solar energy across numerous countries will accelerate the growth of the floating solar panels market.

Cost-Effectiveness to Play a Mammoth Role in Increasing the Growth Rate of the Floating Solar Panels Market

The reduction in costs of the floating solar panels equipment such as floaters due to factors such as a decrease in material cost, enhancement in the manufacturing process, and declined floater thickness will bring profitable growth opportunities for the floating solar panels market.

Purchase Premium Research Report on Floating Solar Panels Market @ https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/checkout.php

Explore Transparency Market Research’s award-winning coverage of the global Energy & Natural Resources Industry,

Solar Panel Recycling Market – https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/solar-panel-recycling-market.html

Solar Street Lighting Market – https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/solar-street-lighting-market-2017-2025.html

Explore More Upcoming Reports: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/upcoming.htm

About Transparency Market Research

Transparency Market Research is a global market intelligence company, providing global business information reports and services. Our exclusive blend of quantitative forecasting and trends analysis provides forward-looking insight for thousands of decision makers. Our experienced team of analysts, researchers, and consultants use proprietary data sources and various tools and techniques to gather and analyze information.

Our data repository is continuously updated and revised by a team of research experts, so that it always reflects the latest trends and information. With a broad research and analysis capability, Transparency Market Research employs rigorous primary and secondary research techniques in developing distinctive data sets and research material for business reports.

Contact

Mr. Rohit Bhisey
Transparency Market Research
State Tower,
90 State Street,
Suite 700,
Albany NY – 12207
United States
USA – Canada Toll Free: 866-552-3453
Email: sales@transparencymarketresearch.com 
Press Release Source: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/pressrelease/floating-solar-panels-market.htm 
Website: http://www.transparencymarketresearch.com

View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/advancements-in-renewable-energy-technologies-to-ignite-extensive-growth-across-floating-solar-panels-market-between-2019-and-2027-tmr-301237274.html

SOURCE Transparency Market Research

LEHI, Utah, March 1, 2021 /PRNewswire-HISPANIC PR WIRE/ — My College Laptop, an education resource website that advocates for technology immersion in colleges, believes technology has been unfairly vilified as the driver of income inequality. The Pew Research Center recently highlighted the technology gap, particularly access to technology by low-income Americans, as a key driver of income inequality.

Studies by K-12 education researchers at Michigan State University demonstrate positive student outcomes of 1:1 laptop programs, teacher training programs and technology immersion programs.

«With positive student outcomes in K-12 across all cohorts and income levels, it’s exciting to see robust college laptop programs thriving in community colleges.  If we assume that K-12 institutions are leading indicators, community colleges that address the tech gap will ultimately improve student outcomes», said Terrence Thomas, Managing Director of My College Laptop.

My College Laptop, has compiled a list of innovative community colleges that are aggressively addressing the technology gap for their students. The community colleges listed below are not ranked in a traditional sense. Instead, we wanted to positively highlight the resourcefulness and determination of community colleges in addressing the technology gap by offering laptops to students. «

The full list with a description of each individual laptop program can be viewed at My College Laptop.

1. Houston Community College – Houston, TX
2. Clovis Community College – Fresno, CA; Clovis, CA
3. Shoreline Community College– Shoreline, WA
4. Mt. San Antonio College – Walnut, CA
5. Western Iowa Tech Community College – Sioux City, IA
6. Montgomery College – Rockville, MD, Takoma Park, MD, Germantown, MD
7. Portland Community College – Portland, OR
8. Los Angeles Community College District – Los Angeles, CA
9. Everett Community College – Everett, WA
10. Harrisburg Area Community College– Harrisburg, PA

About My College Laptop

For over 10 years, My College Laptop, a division of PMA Media Group, has connected over 500,000 students with colleges that provide supportive technology programs to students.  In 2020, My College Laptop partnered with Laptops 4 Learning, a nonprofit 501(c) (3) organization, to provide over 300 laptops to deserving low-income college students. For additional information and a more complete list of traditional, for-profit, and not-for-profit colleges offering technology programs visit My College Laptop.

Media Contact
Terrence Thomas
Managing Director, My College Laptop
480-372-4045 (w)
425-985-7076 (c)

Logo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1444977/My_College_Laptop_Logo.jpg

SOURCE PMA Media Group

«Ahora que la formación a distancia se está convirtiendo en la norma, My College Laptop ha identificado 10 colegios universitarios comunitarios innovadores que prestan un apoyo excepcional a estudiantes de bajos ingresos».

LEHI, Utah, 1 de marzo de 2021 /PRNewswire-HISPANIC PR WIRE/ — My College Laptop, un sitio web de recursos educativos que promueve la inmersión tecnológica en colegios universitarios, cree que la tecnología ha sido injustamente desacreditada como uno de los factores que impulsan la desigualdad en los ingresos. El Centro de Investigaciones Pew destacó recientemente la brecha tecnológica, en particular el acceso a la tecnología de los estadounidenses de bajos ingresos, como un factor clave de la desigualdad en los ingresos.

Los estudios realizados por investigadores en educación desde preescolar hasta el grado 12 de la 

Universidad Estatal de Michigan 

demuestran resultados positivos entre los estudiantes con los programas «una laptop por estudiante», los programas de formación docente y los programas de inmersión tecnológica.

«Con resultados positivos entre los estudiantes desde preescolar hasta el grado 12 en todas las cohortes y niveles de ingresos, es interesante ver cómo programas concretos de entrega de laptops se abren paso en los colegios universitarios comunitarios.  Si asumimos las instituciones educativas desde el nivel preescolar hasta el grado 12 como indicadores principales, los colegios universitarios comunitarios que tratan de eliminar la brecha tecnológica finalmente mejorarán los resultados de sus estudiantes», señaló Terrence Thomas, director administrativo de My College Laptop.

My College Laptop ha compilado una lista de colegios universitarios comunitarios innovadores que tratan enérgicamente de eliminar la brecha tecnológica entre sus estudiantes. Los siguientes colegios universitarios comunitarios no se han clasificado de manera tradicional. Por el contrario, queríamos destacar de manera positiva la inventiva y determinación de los colegios universitarios comunitarios por eliminar la brecha tecnológica al ofrecer laptops a sus estudiantes».

La lista completa con una descripción de cada programa de entrega de laptops se encuentra disponible en My College Laptop.

1. Houston Community College (Houston, Texas)
2. Clovis Community College (Fresno, California; Clovis, California)
3. Shoreline Community College (Shoreline, Washington)
4. Mt. San Antonio College (Walnut, California)
5. Western Iowa Tech Community College (Sioux City, Iowa)
6. Montgomery College (Rockville, Maryland; Takoma Park, Maryland; Germantown, Maryland)
7. Portland Community College (Portland, Oregon)
8. Los Angeles Community College District (Los Ángeles, California)
9. Everett Community College (Everett, Washington)
10. Harrisburg Area Community College (Harrisburg, Pensilvania)

Acerca de My College Laptop 

Durante más de 10 años, My College Laptop, un departamento de PMA Media Group, ha conectado a más de 500,000 con colegios universitarios que ofrecen programas tecnológicos de apoyo a estudiantes.  En 2020, My College Laptop se asoció con Laptops 4 Learning, una organización sin fines de lucro 501(c) (3), para entregar más de 300 laptops a estudiantes destacados de bajos ingresos de colegios universitarios. Para obtener más información y una lista más completa de los colegios universitarios tradicionales, con fines y sin fines de lucro que ofrecen programas tecnológicos, visite My College Laptop.

Contacto de prensa
Terrence Thomas
director administrativo de My College Laptop
480-372-4045 (oficina)
425-985-7076 (celular)

Logotipo: https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1444977/My_College_Laptop_Logo.jpg

FUENTE PMA Media Group

LEHI, Utah, March 1, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — My College Laptop, an education resource website that advocates for technology immersion in colleges, believes technology has been unfairly vilified as the driver of income inequality. The Pew Research Center recently highlighted the technology gap, particularly access to technology by low-income Americans, as a key driver of income inequality.

Studies by K-12 education researchers at Michigan State University demonstrate positive student outcomes of 1:1 laptop programs, teacher training programs and technology immersion programs.

«With positive student outcomes in K-12 across all cohorts and income levels, it’s exciting to see robust college laptop programs thriving in community colleges.  If we assume that K-12 institutions are leading indicators, community colleges that address the tech gap will ultimately improve student outcomes», said Terrence Thomas, Managing Director of My College Laptop.

My College Laptop, has compiled a list of innovative community colleges that are aggressively addressing the technology gap for their students. The community colleges listed below are not ranked in a traditional sense. Instead, we wanted to positively highlight the resourcefulness and determination of community colleges in addressing the technology gap by offering laptops to students. «

The full list with a description of each individual laptop program can be viewed at My College Laptop.

1. Houston Community College – Houston, TX
2. Clovis Community College – Fresno, CA; Clovis, CA
3. Shoreline Community College– Shoreline, WA
4. Mt. San Antonio College – Walnut, CA
5. Western Iowa Tech Community College – Sioux City, IA
6. Montgomery College – Rockville, MD, Takoma Park, MD, Germantown, MD
7. Portland Community College – Portland, OR
8. Los Angeles Community College District – Los Angeles, CA
9. Everett Community College – Everett, WA
10. Harrisburg Area Community College– Harrisburg, PA

About My College Laptop

For over 10 years, My College Laptop, a division of PMA Media Group, has connected over 500,000 students with colleges that provide supportive technology programs to students.  In 2020, My College Laptop partnered with Laptops 4 Learning, a nonprofit 501(c) (3) organization, to provide over 300 laptops to deserving low-income college students. For additional information and a more complete list of traditional, for-profit, and not-for-profit colleges offering technology programs visit My College Laptop.

Media Contact
Terrence Thomas
Managing Director, My College Laptop
480-372-4045 (w)
425-985-7076 (c)

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/my-college-laptop-selects-community-colleges-with-the-best-laptop-loaner-programs-301236860.html

SOURCE PMA Media Group

MUNICH, March 1, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — Today, BayWa r.e. launches its new «Decade That Matters» report, a deep dive into online climate discussions over the past 10 years and what these may tell us about where we are heading over the next 10 years. The report highlights how attitudes to the environment have shifted, how discourse was becoming more urgent and how Covid-19 has affected the global online climate conversation.    

The report has been formed through the curation and analysis of 10-years of trend data across social media, news and blogging platforms, including Twitter, Reddit, Tumblr and Google. The report draws on 1.3 trillion public documents and, to get a clearer view of the recent rapidity of change, includes a more specific investigation into the conversations from 2018 to 2020.

The overall volume of conversations around the topic of ‘climate change’ grew by 110% in 2019 when compared to 2018. But the report also shows a decade-long international shift in public awareness and an evolution in vocabulary as our discussions have moved from ‘global warming’, to ‘climate change’ and, most recently, the use of more urgent language and the beginnings of a further shift towards the more immediate ‘climate crisis’.

Carbon-related conversations (zero, neutral, etc.) are also growing – up 133% year on year in 2019 compared to 2018, and up a further 26% in 2020. Similarly, mentions of ‘clean energy’ and ‘renewable energy’ have grown from under one million per month in 2010, to as many as six million per month in 2019.

Climate change takes a backseat during Covid-19

This increasing conversation was stunted when Covid-19 hit the media in 2020. In the face of the pandemic, the volume of discussions around both the climate and renewable energy solutions decreased. Looking at all online platforms as a whole, mention volumes of climate topics are down more than a million per month from a peak in January, falling 41% on Twitter and 24% across news publications.

The power of humans faced with no alternative

With offices shutting down globally due to the virus, ‘Working from Home’-related conversations in 2020 were five times higher over the course of March, April and May, than they were in January and February, while searches for the term have jumped by several orders of magnitude.

This ability to adapt to change provides a source of inspiration. Indeed, through the conversations that have taken place, we see the pandemic has proved our capability to respond and react to threats on a global scale – through societal reengineering, governmental adaptability and industry-wide reorganisation. 

We are also seeing unimaginable sums of money diverted to address the short-term impacts and longer-term recovery.  And it is here that we may find hope. It is this kind of systemic transformation that BayWa r.e. is hoping can be replicated for the good of the environment.

Matthias Taft, CEO BayWa r.e., commented: «Ten years ago, when BayWa r.e. was founded, we were all already keenly aware that the world had entered a state of profound change. Now, ten years on, we are at a unique point in time. Covid-19 has shown us that when we listen and act on what the science tells us, we have the capacity to pull together and achieve incredible things. We must now see that same sense of urgency applied to addressing the climate crisis.

«This report aims to separate the signal from the noise. The decade of debate, supposition and speculation has ended: for us at BayWa r.e., the ‘Decade That Matters’ is the decade in which we must finally make actions speak louder than words. Where those conversations go next – and what we as business leaders, governments and society decide to do next – will determine our direction of travel for the rest of this decade.»

View the full report at www.decade-that-matters.com

BayWa r.e. renewable energy GmbH (BayWa r.e.): Across solar, wind and bioenergy at BayWa r.e we r.e. think energy – how it is produced, stored and best used. We are a leading global developer, service supplier, distributor and energy solutions provider.

We deliver renewable energy solutions worldwide, and have brought 3.5 GW of energy online, while managing 9 GW of assets.

BayWa r.e is a leading supplier to the solar distribution market. We also have a rapidly growing energy trading business.

We are part of the BayWa Group, a business with revenues of EUR17.1 billion. Every day we are working hard to find new solutions, push technological boundaries and actively shape the future of energy and taking a stand against climate change.

Contact:
BayWa r.e. renewable energy GmbH
Mark Cooper
Corporate Communications
Telephone: +49 89 383932 3611
Email: mark.cooper@baywa-re.com
http://www.baywa-re.com/

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/baywa-re-analyses-10-years-of-online-conversations-to-understand-public-perception-of-the-climate-crisis-301237283.html

SOURCE BayWa r.e. renewable energy GmbH